25 Nov 2009

Have You Seen Sitelinks in Google AdWords Premium Ad Positions?

9 Comments search engine marketing
We were doing a PPC audit for a home security reseller and noticed that the #1 paid spot has 4 sitelinks below the ad.

adt_premium_ad

We’ve always known that you can get up to 8 sitelinks if you’re the #1 search result and have sufficient authority.  But to see these in paid search?  Note that the 4 links under the paid ad don’t seem to correlate with the organic links.  Does anyone have experience with this?
Do the urls have to be the same– such that if adt.com is the #1 organic result, then their paid ad gets extra links if it’s also #1?  If so, that would create a significant incentive to bid to the first position, which would already increase the frenzy for folks who just want to be in the first spot, regardless of ROI.
Have you seen this in other ads?  Please let me know and I’ll be happy to post your experience here.
Overall, seems like Google is allocating more and more space to paid search results and less on organic.  For those folks who have relied only on SEO– whether enterprise clients or local businesses that have counted on traffic from their local 10 pack listings– watch out!
Tags: , , , , ,
written by
Facebook data and ads geek relentless in measuring real ROI. Chief Technical Officer of BlitzMetrics. Google+
Related Posts
Loading Facebook Comments ...

9 Responses to “Have You Seen Sitelinks in Google AdWords Premium Ad Positions?”

  1. Reply matt says:

    Yes, it’s a beta function only available to a limited # of advertisers & think it runs on a CPA basis.

  2. Reply Have You Seen Sitelinks in Google AdWords Premium Ad Positions? Mobile Advertise says:

    [...] the rest here:  Have You Seen Sitelinks in Google AdWords Premium Ad Positions? By admin | category: internet advertising | tags: dennis, denver, friends-great, home-dad, [...]

  3. Reply Have You Seen Sitelinks in Google AdWords Premium Ad Positions? — Affiliates Insider: Showing You The Insides says:

    [...] more here: Have You Seen Sitelinks in Google AdWords Premium Ad Positions? Share and [...]

  4. Reply uberVU - social comments says:

    Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by polgarine: Have You Seen Sitelinks in Google AdWords Premium Ad Positions?: Have You Seen Sitelinks in Google AdWords Premium … http://bit.ly/6Xuzhf

  5. Reply David Rothwell says:

    As Matt states it’s a limited beta trial. We are an agency in the Uk who have been given access to this for a small number of clients (along with the AdWords Plusbox). We are currently trialling both but yet to see ads show with sitelinks running, although we have the PlusBox working great.

    You can have up to 10 sitelinks in your account. They point to specific urls you already have.

    Up to a maximum of four will display, but Google only serves them up for a highly relevant, strong Quality Score and CTR keyword. They stress the “brand” related nature of this at the moment.

    There’s more on PlusBox on my site.

  6. Reply David Rothwell says:

    PS it’s not a CPA basis…

  7. Reply Sitelinks in Google PPC Ads– You don’t want to miss this! says:

    [...] toes or to use the general public for beta testing?  Anyway, a couple days ago, I blogged about sitelinks in AdWords– that you can specify up to 10 links underneath your regular paid ad if you happen to also in [...]

  8. Reply Google AdWords Bid Simulator– observations says:

    [...] I think Google may have neglected to include in their Bid Simulator is the impact of sitelinks in position 1, which give a tremendous boost to position 1 advertisers.  This estimation would be [...]

  9. Reply Dennis Yu: local online marketing, facebook advertising, internet guru » Doing cosmetic surgery on a cosmetic surgeon– what we learned in 2009 says:

    [...] going to take advantage of Google’s latest features for local– ad extensions, sitelinks, Google Favorite Places, Facebook integration, and so forth.  And look forward to a new site in [...]

Leave a Reply